She was the daughter of Zeus and Leda, the wife of Menelaus, and the sister of Castor, Polydeuces and Clytemnestra. Helen of Troy appears in many accounts of Greek history, but they are not always consistent with each other in terms of accuracy. Her origins and history differ from tale to tale; however, they do all project the same image of Helen—the attractive, sought-after daughter of Zeus. Here, Virgil’s account of Helen of Troy in The Aeineid is the focus.
The Aeneid portrays Helen as an extremely desirable woman, the most beautiful that there is in the land. She is married to Melenaus, but when
In book II of the Aeneid, Helen is hiding in the midst of the war that she has, indirectly or partially directly, caused. Aeneas finds her and resolves to kill her, bitter over the thought that Helen should sail happily after causing so the wreckage. However, Venus, Aeneas’ mother, appears and tells him not to blame “Helen’s face” for the war. Aeneas and Venus’ reactions are just examples of the general attitude towards Helen that seemed to be present. Helen was certainly a beautiful woman for people to say that her beauty caused the war; however, in the story, her bloodline also made her significant. Being the daughter of Zeus, she would be a woman of some importance regardless of her looks. It is quite unlikely for only a woman’s beauty to cause an entire war. If Helen existed, it would be more believable to note that that ships were sent after Helen because she also had some rank on her side; perhaps she was the daughter of an equally influential man in Troy.
The question is: are Virgil's writings based off of an actual Helen of Troy, a lady of significant rank and beauty that has been embellished in her retelling?
Well, archaeologists have found that evidence shows that
My conclusion is that Helen of Troy was an iconic and important character in Virgil’s take on
Works cited:
Virgil. Virgil's Aeineid.
Lovgren, Stefan. Is
McCarty, Nick.